The town of Thomasville, GA Is NOT immune to “Green Washing”
I was recently introduced to an article in the St. Petersburg Times that deals with the now-popular term "greenwashing". It was called "'Green' Houses in Name Only?" by Chuin-Wei Yap. I thought the author did a good job of framing the problem that is starting to crop up everywhere in real estate - sellers inappropriately identifying their homes as "green" or "energy efficient". I loved this quote:
"As home building slumps and environmentalism becomes a business advantage, a fast-growing market for green homes is becoming synonymous with "buyer beware"
The article addressed the lack of proper oversight in "green" claims and the frustrations certifying organizations face when they see claims being made. Since most of the oversight still is voluntary, there's nothing to stop a builder (or realtor) from making a claim that the home is energy efficient or even green-built. In fact, we have at least one builder I know of who's labeling their homes as energy efficient (they're nothing special, and are not certified as Energy Star or better to my knowledge). When I questioned the claim to the listing agent (in a friendly way) I got silence in reply.
"Greenwashing" is the general term for mis-representation or over-representation of a product's environmentally-friendly attributes. Keep a sharp eye out for this trend in real estate and "buyer beware".
http://activerain.com/blogsview/502458/watch-for-green-claims-to-rise-in-real-estate
Thomasville & Cairo Georgia Dual Agency in a Nut Shell
There are good real estate agents and bad real estate agents. And within each category are agents whose behavior puts them at the very top and very bottom of the spectrum. Dual Agency: A listing agent who also represents the buyer is a dual agent. Dual agents cannot operate in a fiduciary relationship with either party and must treat both sellers and buyers equally. They cannot share confidential information and they cannot give confidential advice. Real Estate Services
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Dual agency = Let's Screw Them Twice!
I realize some states are lucky enough that Dual-Agency is ILLEGAL and I wish tomorrow it would become illegal in ALL states, but until then, I'll continue to warn buyers & Sellers to stay clear of DUAL AGENCY! For any reader that doesn't know what dual agency means, it's when one RE agent represents BOTH buyer & Seller. Trust me, you DO NOT want to EVER have your agent represent both you and the Seller/Buyer. It can be the WORSE move in the RE transaction that you could possibly make!!! And guess what? It DOES NOT help you as a Buyer OR Selller in any way shape or form. The ONLY person it helps is the agent and or broker! How? Because it takes one agent out of the equation therefore it ultimately give the agent/broker MUCH MORE OF YOUR MONEY!!! You have ABSOLUTELY NO OBLIGATION to agree to DUAL AGENCY and why this is still legal in many states is a complete mystery to me!!!!
MAKE SURE that when you sign your listing agreement, Buyer's agent agreement, or any paperwork for that matter, you DO NOT allow the RE agent to slip you this DUAL AGENCY form to sign!!!!
Would you want your attorney to represent you and the defendant? THIS IS NO DIFFERENT!!!! PLEASE BEWARE! It's your money and your house! Guard it with your life! Think about it? Why else would it be ILLEGAL in many states?
MAKE SURE that when you sign your listing agreement, Buyer's agent agreement, or any paperwork for that matter, you DO NOT allow the RE agent to slip you this DUAL AGENCY form to sign!!!!
Would you want your attorney to represent you and the defendant? THIS IS NO DIFFERENT!!!! PLEASE BEWARE! It's your money and your house! Guard it with your life! Think about it? Why else would it be ILLEGAL in many states?
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/real-estate/639743-dual-agency-lets-screw-them-twice.html#ixzz1VtPTAJI7
Dual Agency Should Be Illegal! - Georgia is a Dual Agency State
According to the National Association of Realtors, “As a customer, a buyer is not represented by an agent… the agent cannot negotiate on the buyer’s behalf nor reveal to the buyer any confidences of the client, the client is the seller.” Without the benefits of using a Buyer Representative, you become just a customer to the seller and their agent.
The seller’s agent is legally obligated to get the most money for the seller. Can the Seller's Agent who is contracted to work in the best interest of one party also work in the best interest of the Buyer? They can not. A seller’s agent, by law, must work in the best interest of their client, including giving information about the buyers to the sellers. Buyers Agents work in your best interest. The goal is to get you the best price and the most savings possible.
This is not Real Estate for Dummies. But, it probably should be. The basic definition of dual agency is “The same real estate agent is representing both buyer and seller in the same transaction”. Dual agency is the single worst issue involved in real estate. The average “Joe” out of the street easily understands that dual agency is WRONG. This seems like common sense to the regular guy. So, why can’t the politicians and many real estate agents & brokers understand this simple terrible concept? The main reason why dual agency exists is because of the glorious MOOLAH. Real estate brokers and agents have a huge financial incentive to be involved in a dual agency transaction at the detriment of their buyer or seller. Dual agency has no benefits to protect the consumer (buyer or seller). One of the simplest and best examples that I’ve ever read about the problems of dual agency actually came from a traditional real estate agent (Matt Difanis) in Illinois and not an Exclusive Buyer Agent. A few years back, Matt had a sent this letter to the Realtor Magazine.
Here is another real simple definition; agency is when a real estate broker discloses “who” & “how” they are going to represent a buyer or seller. Home buyers need to STOP spending all their time on the Internet looking at pretty pictures of potential homes and START spending more time fully understanding all types of agency (dual, single, transactional, limited or designated). Understanding agency is definitely not the most exciting part of the home buying process. As a matter of fact, it is down right boring. But, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE; before you start down the path of buying a home make sure you spend time fully researching everything. As with many major financial decisions (car, home, vacation, etc.) most of us end up rationalizing decisions based on emotion, don’t make a decision based on emotion!!
Non-disclosed dual agency is ILLEGAL in all 50 states. But, only a few states have made (disclosed) dual agency illegal. Dual agency should be”outlawed” and made illegal in all 50 states. If you are a buyer or seller involved in a dual agency transaction and you don’t completely understand dual agency than you should immediately contact or RUN to your nearest real estate attorney.
A TRUE AGENT is one who provides 100% loyalty to his/her clients 100% of the time. No dual agency; no "designated agency", no "transaction brokerage;" no "Chinese walls;" no weasel clauses! - International Real Estate Directory
Buyers Agent: Representing People, Dual Agency: Commission
http://mybuyerbrokerblog.com/2007/10/28/dual-agency-should-be-illegal/
The seller’s agent is legally obligated to get the most money for the seller. Can the Seller's Agent who is contracted to work in the best interest of one party also work in the best interest of the Buyer? They can not. A seller’s agent, by law, must work in the best interest of their client, including giving information about the buyers to the sellers. Buyers Agents work in your best interest. The goal is to get you the best price and the most savings possible.
This is not Real Estate for Dummies. But, it probably should be. The basic definition of dual agency is “The same real estate agent is representing both buyer and seller in the same transaction”. Dual agency is the single worst issue involved in real estate. The average “Joe” out of the street easily understands that dual agency is WRONG. This seems like common sense to the regular guy. So, why can’t the politicians and many real estate agents & brokers understand this simple terrible concept? The main reason why dual agency exists is because of the glorious MOOLAH. Real estate brokers and agents have a huge financial incentive to be involved in a dual agency transaction at the detriment of their buyer or seller. Dual agency has no benefits to protect the consumer (buyer or seller). One of the simplest and best examples that I’ve ever read about the problems of dual agency actually came from a traditional real estate agent (Matt Difanis) in Illinois and not an Exclusive Buyer Agent. A few years back, Matt had a sent this letter to the Realtor Magazine.
Here is another real simple definition; agency is when a real estate broker discloses “who” & “how” they are going to represent a buyer or seller. Home buyers need to STOP spending all their time on the Internet looking at pretty pictures of potential homes and START spending more time fully understanding all types of agency (dual, single, transactional, limited or designated). Understanding agency is definitely not the most exciting part of the home buying process. As a matter of fact, it is down right boring. But, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE; before you start down the path of buying a home make sure you spend time fully researching everything. As with many major financial decisions (car, home, vacation, etc.) most of us end up rationalizing decisions based on emotion, don’t make a decision based on emotion!!
Non-disclosed dual agency is ILLEGAL in all 50 states. But, only a few states have made (disclosed) dual agency illegal. Dual agency should be”outlawed” and made illegal in all 50 states. If you are a buyer or seller involved in a dual agency transaction and you don’t completely understand dual agency than you should immediately contact or RUN to your nearest real estate attorney.
A TRUE AGENT is one who provides 100% loyalty to his/her clients 100% of the time. No dual agency; no "designated agency", no "transaction brokerage;" no "Chinese walls;" no weasel clauses! - International Real Estate Directory
Buyers Agent: Representing People, Dual Agency: Commission
http://mybuyerbrokerblog.com/2007/10/28/dual-agency-should-be-illegal/
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Can you trust a dual agent realtor to work on behalf of the buyer or Seller?
A MOST READ IF YOU PLAN TO WORK WITH A DUAL AGENCY.......
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Thomasville, Georgia - Good ol' boy network - Alive and Well

Good ol' boy network and its meaning:
, or "Good old boys", describes a system of social networking alleged to exist among communities and social strata. These networks are assumed to be located throughout the world and very prominent in small towns like Thomasville,GA. It is sometimes taken to refer to informal legal, judicial, social, religious, business, and political associations among members, ("good ol' boys").
Some negative effects of the good ol' boy network are its exclusion of others, leading to possibly limiting business transactions to other elites or to friends or acquaintances from within the network, to give friends better deals, and generally to reinforce traditional power structures over any other elements in the society.
Most consumers and sellers do not realize that some real estate agents and brokerage offices supporting these low to bare minimum code homes knowingly and pushing these homes to consumers are only doing so for its easy sell while many listings sit un shown for years and sellers jumping from brokerage companies in hopes that their properties are shown more often. While these new under minimum code homes are pushed to consumers for being the best of the best other home sellers sit listening to their listing agents advise them to lower their selling prices because new and bigger homes are being sold for rock bottom prices and these prices are possible because of cutting corners in building cost. Our building inspectors should be vigilant to these practices in order to protect the consumers in order for them to utmost acquire a home built to minimum code.
It's becoming more and more common to find misrepresented listings and claiming the properties to be more efficient and misstating their square footage in order to manipulate the price/sq. ft. and by using the words (By Owner) as a loophole for the real estate agent and is sadly tolerated while the consumer gets mislead only to find out they ended up on the shorter end of the deal.
Whatever happened to looking beyond the square footage and weighing in the amenities of each property and negotiating and comparing property amenities and their individual situation for their low sale? Why is it that certain Realtors have their hands in the home building industry and their personal listings selling for full price or very close to listing price and others have to sell below apprised value? Is your Realtor telling you that your home is overpriced? One possible reason is that Realtors are pushing homes under $300,000 thousand with more then over 3,000sq.ft. being built to bare minimum code and possibly even below code and comparing all homes to these SQUARE FOOTAGE. Agents bringing buyers to these homes everyday while others trying not to loss their home are not getting shown. What type of service are these dual agents providing to all their sellers and not to mention their buyers? Consumers did you know that a dual agent is not allowed to negotiate for either party in this capacity? They would be breaking the law if they did. Why would you deal with an agent in this capacity? I pose this question. Would you hire a divorce attorney working for you soon ex-husband? same scenario.
The following is a True Story experienced by our company in this small town and evidence of the Good 'O Boy network in action:
We began building custom homes in Cairo, GA and offering features that were not being offered by no other local builder in effort to provide home buyers with a higher quality home with luxury features specific to each home we built. As a new company in the area and in a small town, we wanted to hire local quality companies. We visited many construction sites in search for these companies since we did not find many companies in the traditional way through advertisements. We visited many construction site in Thomasville, GA looking at different subcontractors and their workmanship. “Mind You” Cairo GA. is a small town and it is approximately 10 minutes from Thomasville, GA. We were searching for a good local trim company and wanted to have the opportunity to see the trim work as well and we noted some work being done on a new home being built. As we visited the site to look at the workmanship in order to consider the trim company, we spoke with the person doing the trim work which was a small one man operation local company. We looked around the home and liked their detailed work and we asked him if he would be interested in doing some work for us up in Cairo GA. The gentleman replied “sure he would love to do the work” We gave him one of our business cards and asked him to call us. To our surprise when he took a look at our business card and saw our company name he informed us that he would not be able to do any work for our company and if he did the Good old’ boy Network would not give him anymore work in Thomasville, GA. Mind you these times where booming with home sales. At that point we realized that the small town of Thomasville did not receive new comers in the real estate business very well and to our astonishment could not believe these form of band existed in today's day and age.
So, it makes you think who is manipulating the real estate system? Sellers and buyers do not realize what really goes on behind the scenes until they personally have been affected by the same systems that placed them in their homes but by then it is to late and a bitter experience is achieved and all Realtors are grouped with the bad apples in the industry. We have spoken to enough people to know that there are many with the same sentiments but do not have the means to publish there opinions. Many in the industry are not very happy with our strong opinions and bringing these issues to light.
But these blog's are meant to educate consumers with our experiences and knowledge of what we see happening in our community. If you the reader feel differently and do not care for the information you are more then welcome to exit this web page and we want to thank you for your visit but we like to express our freedom of speech which is one of our countries greatest rights.
Izzy Bienes / Builder / Developer - Holds a Florida & Georgia Real Estate License
http://www.trulia.com/blog/CHBEcoCustomHomes/2011/02/thomasville_georgia_-_good_ol_boy_network_-_alive_and_well
Monday, December 13, 2010
The "Top 10 Complaints" Received by the Real Estate Commission
1. Misrepresentation
The License Law requires agents to refrain from misrepresenting material facts - either affirmatively or by willful or negligent omission. What is a material fact? Generally speaking, it is any information which the parties need to know in order to make an informed decision (i.e., which might affect the parties' decision to purchase or sell, or which has the potential to put the contract or interests of the parties at risk).
Material facts fall into three broad categories: facts about the property (leaky roof, synthetic stucco siding, presence of asbestos, etc.); facts relating to the property, including zoning changes and plans for a major highway nearby; and facts which relate to a principal's ability to complete the transaction, such as a bank foreclosure. Typical complaints of misrepresentation involve material facts that include hidden defects, changes in land use, whether a piece of land "percs," square footage and lot-size errors.
A recent complaint came from a condominium-buyer who discovered after closing that the condominium was smaller than she had been led to believe. In fact, the unit measured 200 square feet LESS than the figures in the listing agreement! The listing agent admitted to having used tax records to obtain the square footage.
To avoid this type of complaint, disciplinary action by the Commission and the potential for civil liability, do your homework! Don't rely on the work of others. Measure each piece of property yourself.
Be aware that your duty to properly disclose includes oral representations and representations made in print, so check your MLS listings and advertisements for accuracy. Also be aware of your duty to disclose material facts to all parties involved in the transaction, not just to the party you represent.
5. Disputes over Contract Acceptance
The Statute of Frauds requires that all contracts for the sale of land be in writing to be enforceable. Furthermore, all negotiated terms must be in writing, any changes must be initialed by the parties, and the contract must be signed by all parties.
A typical complaint occurs when agents negotiate for their clients orally; e.g., an oral counteroffer is relayed to the buyers and they agree to the new terms; their agent calls and informs the sellers' agent, who tells the sellers. The sellers think that they have a binding contract, but they don't. While the oral acceptance is an indication that a contract will soon be formed, it is not itself legally binding.
To avoid creating conflict between the parties and to ensure that your clients have an enforceable contract, don't tell them that they have a contract until you have the contract signed by all parties.
7. Conflict of Interest
The License Law prohibits agents in a transaction from acting for more than one party without the knowledge of all parties. Complaints in this area usually deal with dual agency, seller subagency, and special relationships between the parties.
With dual agency, there is an inherent conflict of interest because the agent is representing both the buyer and seller, who have different and competing interests. To avoid this type of complaint, you as a dual agent must be sure to disclose the duties that you owe to each party. Thoroughly review the agency forms and explain how your responsibilities as a dual agent differ from those in an exclusive agency arrangement. Finally, be sure to have the parties sign the Dual Agency Contract or Dual Agency Addendum, whichever is appropriate.
As a seller's subagent, keep in mind that although you are working with the buyer, your primary obligation is to the seller. Don't advise the buyer on strategy or advocate on his or her behalf.
Finally, if you have a special relationship with any party to the transaction (e.g., you are a relative of the buyer), disclose it to all parties to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
8. Discrimination
Recently the Commission received a complaint alleging discrimination at an open house. The matter ultimately was resolved, but not before an investigation by both the Real Estate Commission and the North Carolina Human Relations Commission.
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in the sale or rental of dwellings of four or more units on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status (the presence of children under 18 years old) or handicapping conditions (including AIDS). Therefore, if you discover that the landlord, tenant, seller, or buyer that you represent intends to discriminate on the basis of any of these protected classes, you must immediately terminate your agency agreement with that party, or risk violating the law and losing your license to sell real estate in this state.
9. Records Violations
When the Commission receives a complaint, the first thing Commission staff requests is a copy of the firm's records, including bank statements, canceled checks referencing a ledger sheet, deposit tickets, separate ledgers, general journal or check stubs identifying each transaction, copies of contracts, leases, management agreements, closing statements, property management statements, and other relevant documents.
Commission rules require that agents retain records for three years; however, because complaints filed after the three-year limit for record retention are investigated, the Commission recommends that agents retain their records for longer than three years. Be aware that your documents indicating proper record-keeping can be used in your defense in the event that a complaint is filed against you.
10. Lack of Communication
Many complaints to the Commission come from disgruntled clients. Complainants state that their agents will not return their phone calls or keep them updated on their transactions.
Try to avoid this situation by communicating with your clients. Return their phone calls. Keep them informed about what you are doing for them and how the transaction is going. An informed client is less likely to complain to the Commission.
By Pamela V. Millward, Associate Legal Counsel
The License Law requires agents to refrain from misrepresenting material facts - either affirmatively or by willful or negligent omission. What is a material fact? Generally speaking, it is any information which the parties need to know in order to make an informed decision (i.e., which might affect the parties' decision to purchase or sell, or which has the potential to put the contract or interests of the parties at risk).
Material facts fall into three broad categories: facts about the property (leaky roof, synthetic stucco siding, presence of asbestos, etc.); facts relating to the property, including zoning changes and plans for a major highway nearby; and facts which relate to a principal's ability to complete the transaction, such as a bank foreclosure. Typical complaints of misrepresentation involve material facts that include hidden defects, changes in land use, whether a piece of land "percs," square footage and lot-size errors.
A recent complaint came from a condominium-buyer who discovered after closing that the condominium was smaller than she had been led to believe. In fact, the unit measured 200 square feet LESS than the figures in the listing agreement! The listing agent admitted to having used tax records to obtain the square footage.
To avoid this type of complaint, disciplinary action by the Commission and the potential for civil liability, do your homework! Don't rely on the work of others. Measure each piece of property yourself.
Be aware that your duty to properly disclose includes oral representations and representations made in print, so check your MLS listings and advertisements for accuracy. Also be aware of your duty to disclose material facts to all parties involved in the transaction, not just to the party you represent.
5. Disputes over Contract Acceptance
The Statute of Frauds requires that all contracts for the sale of land be in writing to be enforceable. Furthermore, all negotiated terms must be in writing, any changes must be initialed by the parties, and the contract must be signed by all parties.
A typical complaint occurs when agents negotiate for their clients orally; e.g., an oral counteroffer is relayed to the buyers and they agree to the new terms; their agent calls and informs the sellers' agent, who tells the sellers. The sellers think that they have a binding contract, but they don't. While the oral acceptance is an indication that a contract will soon be formed, it is not itself legally binding.
To avoid creating conflict between the parties and to ensure that your clients have an enforceable contract, don't tell them that they have a contract until you have the contract signed by all parties.
7. Conflict of Interest
The License Law prohibits agents in a transaction from acting for more than one party without the knowledge of all parties. Complaints in this area usually deal with dual agency, seller subagency, and special relationships between the parties.
With dual agency, there is an inherent conflict of interest because the agent is representing both the buyer and seller, who have different and competing interests. To avoid this type of complaint, you as a dual agent must be sure to disclose the duties that you owe to each party. Thoroughly review the agency forms and explain how your responsibilities as a dual agent differ from those in an exclusive agency arrangement. Finally, be sure to have the parties sign the Dual Agency Contract or Dual Agency Addendum, whichever is appropriate.
As a seller's subagent, keep in mind that although you are working with the buyer, your primary obligation is to the seller. Don't advise the buyer on strategy or advocate on his or her behalf.
Finally, if you have a special relationship with any party to the transaction (e.g., you are a relative of the buyer), disclose it to all parties to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
8. Discrimination
Recently the Commission received a complaint alleging discrimination at an open house. The matter ultimately was resolved, but not before an investigation by both the Real Estate Commission and the North Carolina Human Relations Commission.
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in the sale or rental of dwellings of four or more units on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status (the presence of children under 18 years old) or handicapping conditions (including AIDS). Therefore, if you discover that the landlord, tenant, seller, or buyer that you represent intends to discriminate on the basis of any of these protected classes, you must immediately terminate your agency agreement with that party, or risk violating the law and losing your license to sell real estate in this state.
9. Records Violations
When the Commission receives a complaint, the first thing Commission staff requests is a copy of the firm's records, including bank statements, canceled checks referencing a ledger sheet, deposit tickets, separate ledgers, general journal or check stubs identifying each transaction, copies of contracts, leases, management agreements, closing statements, property management statements, and other relevant documents.
Commission rules require that agents retain records for three years; however, because complaints filed after the three-year limit for record retention are investigated, the Commission recommends that agents retain their records for longer than three years. Be aware that your documents indicating proper record-keeping can be used in your defense in the event that a complaint is filed against you.
10. Lack of Communication
Many complaints to the Commission come from disgruntled clients. Complainants state that their agents will not return their phone calls or keep them updated on their transactions.
Try to avoid this situation by communicating with your clients. Return their phone calls. Keep them informed about what you are doing for them and how the transaction is going. An informed client is less likely to complain to the Commission.
By Pamela V. Millward, Associate Legal Counsel
When buying or selling real estate and working with dual agency always educate yourself on the rules and ethical responsibilities of dual agency. Some real estate agents have been doing dual agency for a long time and are very good when it comes to using loopholes on listing properties, like the “Word” “Buy Owner” when it comes to square footage – like when public records square footage does not match owners square footage, energy efficient home, extra insulation, quality home, bonus rooms done without a permit. If you suspect something is wrong with your real estate transaction you should consult a trusted real estate Attorney.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Dual Agency is the Ultimate "Bait and Switch."
Bait and SwitchDual agency is potentially one of the worst “bait and switches” possible because it involves the “switch” (abandonment) of a trusted advisor and advocate. Even with disclosures, consumers rarely expect the change in relationship that comes with dual agency and they are almost never prepared for the complete abandonment that defines dual agency. And despite the degradation in the level of services in a dual agency situation, the client still pays full commission in a dual agency.
Should Less Service Equate to a Lesser Fee?
The Consumer Federation of America came up with a recommended fee schedule that suggests a sliding downward scale to align the degradation of services that results from dual agency with a lowering of the fee Realtors charge. According to them, less service should translate into a lower fee. The Minnesota Bar Association incorporated this fee structure into their Standard Listing Contract, but since Realtors typically control which listing contract consumers sign, the Bar Association’s Contract is rarely used. (see attachments below). As a result, consumers typically pay the same amount for an agent who offers nearly no service (a dual agent) as they would for an agent who provides full service.
Compare to Attorneys
Attorneys possess incomparably superior education and licensing standards as compared to Realtors. In addition, attorneys are trained in how to manage conflicts of interest. Realtors are not.
Attorneys must have a post graduate doctorate degree and pass a State Bar Exam in order to become licensed. They also have a meaningful Code of Ethics that provides substantial and public penalties for infractions. Even with their tremendous training in agency relationships and conflict management, attorneys avoid dual agency because of the impossible situations it creates.
Licensing requirements for real estate agents are essentially non-existent. The minimum standard to obtain a real estate license doesn’t even require a high school diploma and an individual can often obtain their license after taking only a 30 hour class on how to pass the exam. And their "Code of Ethics" is enforced by peers (competitors) who are members of their trade association and all decisions are kept private. Licensing laws are typically lax as is enforcement of those laws.
There really is no comparison. Realtors do not possess the necessary training or education to engage in such a complex relationship as dual agency.
Despite the complete lack of minimum standards and the incredible complexity and danger of dual agency, it is now legal in most states for Realtors to practice dual agency. It is typically not legal for attorneys.
Attorneys run conflict checks to avoid dual agency and have for the most part bifurcated their profession into plaintiff and defendant firms. Nothing like that system exists for Realtors. We believe that it should. To make matters worse, Realtors don’t understand dual agency, they have little training in conflict management, the and disclosure forms are misleading and inadequate. Consumers don't understand it, are highly vulnerable and typically rely upon their Realtor for skewed and inconsistent “advice” about dual agency. And to totally drive the malfeasance home, Realtors are financially encouraged to practice dual agency and fondly refer to the bagging of dual agency clients as a “hogger.”
The Worst Kind of Swine Flu
Dual agency (aka "Hoggers") exist to enable real estate brokerage firms to double in size and to unfairly collect double commissions. It's greedy, dishonest and anti-competitive. Similar to theft by swindle, dual agency is highly profitable and relies upon the vulnerabilities of its victims to succeed. Oddly enough, dual agency was a response to an innovative entrepreneurial business model of exclusive buyer agency that was quickly gaining market share. Buyer agency offers a legitimate and substantial benefit to consumers in that agents sacrifice the profitability of both buying and selling properties for the exclusive loyalty that comes with only representing buyers.
Dual agency confused and misled the marketplace about buyer agency and all but destroyed the exclusive buyer brokerage innovation. It was a great loss as buyer agency aligned the agent’s financial interests with the interests of the client. It brought a higher level of integrity to the industry. It should be noted that exclusive buyer agency still exists and is promoted by a trade organization called the National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents (NAEBA).
Omnipotent Lobbying Power
Instead of representing only buyers or only sellers, brokerage firms busted through the constraints of fiduciary case law in order to collect double commissions. Without an all powerful lobbying group behind them (National Association of Realtors “NAR”), it never would have been possible to legalize conduct that is more accurately described as a betrayal. The common law standard to permit dual agency requires a full disclosure of all the material conflicts of interest (an almost impossible standard) and the informed consent of the client (another almost impossible standard). Rather than adhere to these common sense standards, Realtor Associations across the country changed the law so that they could double dip. They amassed a colossal lobbying effort to rewrite state laws to allow for dual agency. In one lobbying effort they defiled two hundred years of common law and eliminated an important and already successful point of redress for consumers who were harmed by dual agency – class action lawsuits.
NAR – Dual Agency is a Totally Inappropriate Agency Relationship
Hypocritically, it should be noted that the National Association of Realtors previously took the position that, “Dual agency is a totally inappropriate agency relationship for real estate brokers to create as a matter of general business practice…The disclosures and consents necessary to make a dual agency lawful are so comprehensive and specific that a typical real estate broker cannot undertake them as a matter of routine.” Taken from “Who Is My Client? *– A Realtors Guide to Compliance with the Law of Agency” 1986 National Association of Realtors. See attachment below. The Executive Vice President of the Association also wrote a letter about the topic.
Dual Agency Should Be Banned
CAARE’s position on dual agency is that it should be banned. It is an insurmountable conflict of interest that results in the abandonment of the client when they need their agent the most – right when they find the property they want. No Dual Agency On Federally Funded Loans At the very least, investors who loan mortgage money should forbid dual agency in their transactions. In addition, HUD should forbid dual agency on all federally funded loans. When mortgage fraud is rampant, consumers need more than ever to be able rely upon their Realtor for exclusive representation and unbiased and untainted advice. We would like to see the elimination of disclosure statements that disclose bad conduct like dual agency and see in its place the elimination of bad conduct like dual agency.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


